Monday, April 26, 2010
The importance of game 5 in a 2-2 series
Friday, April 23, 2010
The importance of winning game 3
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Reevaluating my first round picks
#1 Cleveland vs #8 Chicago
Prediction before series: Cavs in 5
Prediction after 2 games: Cavs in 5
The Bulls are young and feisty and can play with Cleveland. I think its enough to get them a win in Chicago. They will play hard because the last thing they want is to get embarrassed at home.
#2 Orlando vs #7 Charlotte
Prediction before series: Magic in 4
Prediction after 2 games: Magic in 4
Orlando has gotten very little out of Dwight Howard, and they have still won the first 2 games pretty easily. Charlotte just isn’t capable of scoring enough points to make Orlando sweat. I just don’t see them winning a game in this series.
#3 Atlanta vs #6 Milwaukee
Prediction before series: Hawks in 5
Prediction after 2 games: Hawks in 5
The Bucks will have a good crowd at home, and I really would like to see them get a game. They have played hard in both games; they have just fallen behind early. I think they will start strong in one of the 2 games at home, and they will ride the crowd to a win.
#4 Boston vs #5 Miami
Prediction before series: Heat in 6
Prediction after 2 games: Celtics in 5
I really could not have been more wrong about this series. I thought this Heat team was a little better than the team that took Atlanta to game 7 last year. I was wrong. The Celtics have played great defense since the middle of the third quarter in game 1, and Miami can’t get anything going offensively. I’m not even sure if Miami will win a game, but I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt.
Western Conference
#1 LA Lakers vs #8 Oklahoma City
Prediction before series: Lakers in 5
Prediction after 2 games: Lakers in 5
The Lakers haven’t looked great in either game, but they know how to win close playoff games, and the Thunder hasn’t quite figured it out. I think OK City blows them out in game 3, but the Lakers comeback and win a close game 4, and win game 5 rather easily. That is usually the way a series like this turns out.
#2 Dallas vs #7 San Antonio
Prediction before series: Mavs in 5
Prediction after 2 games: Mavs in 7
I was real disappointed with the way Dallas played in game 2. I’m still not sure if San Antonio is capable of replicating the way they played throughout the rest of the series, but I do think they can at least get a split at home, making this a long series. I think Dallas is better, and in the end they could simply wear down the Spurs, especially if they are able to push tempo.
#3 Phoenix vs #6 Portland
Prediction before series: Suns in 5
Prediction after 2 games: Suns in 5
This one is real hard because it’s hard for me to imagine Portland losing 2 straight home games, but I think Alvin Gentry might have figured some things out in between games 1 and 2. Now Portland is dealing with more injuries, and I just don’t see how they can keep up with Phoenix. I think they caught Phoenix by surprise in game 1, but now that Portland has their attention, the Suns will take care of business.
#4 Denver vs #5 Utah
Prediction before series: Jazz in 6
Prediction after 2 games: Jazz in 6
I don’t feel overly confident in this pick, but I was real impressed by Utah’s toughness in game 2. I don’t see Denver being able to win in Utah, mostly because they have a tendency to lose focus, and you can’t do that on the road in the playoffs.
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
Win percentages after game 2 in a best-of-7 series
In the last 196 best of 7 series the home team won game one 146 times. 130 of those teams won the series (89%).
When the team with home court advantage took a 2-0 series lead they won the series 92.9% of the time (104/112)
In the last 196 best of 7 series the road team won game one 50 times, 29 of those teams won the series (58%).
Just 9 of those 39 teams would go home with a 2-0 series lead, 7 of those teams held on and won the series (2005 Houston lost to Dallas in 7 games after winning games 1 and 2 in Dallas, and 1994 Phoenix lost to Houston in 7 games after winning games 1 and 2 in Houston.)
Of the last 196 best of 7 series, 75 have been split after 2 games. The team that began the series with the home court advantage won the series 47 times (62.3%)
In 1995 they won the first 2 games on the road of the Western Conference Finals against San Antonio, and they took the first 2 games of the Finals in Orlando. They lost the first 2 games at home in 2008 against Utah. The teams that came back after losing the first 2 games at home each won the next 3, would lose on the road in game 6, and then win game 7 at home.
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Joakim Noah vs the city of Cleveland
I love how he is making the reporters either lie by saying Cleveland is great or admit that he was right. To illustrate how amazing Cleveland is, I thought I would post the Hastily Made Cleveland Tourism Video that was made famous during the Eastern Conference Finals.
Monday, April 19, 2010
Quick thoughts on all 8 game 1's
Sunday, April 18, 2010
The Curse of Grant Hill

When you talk about the best players in the NBA who have never won a playoff series the first name you come to is Tracy McGrady, but we have seem to forgotten another big name, in fact he was a teammate of McGrady's, although they never actually played in a playoff game together. That of course is Grant Hill who never won a playoff series in Detroit, appeared in just one playoff series with Orlando, after McGrady was traded, and lost his only playoff series with Phoenix 2 years ago. Here are Grant Hill's playoff results and stats:
| Year | Team | GP | GS | MPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1995–96 | Detroit | 3 | 3 | 38.3 | .564 | .500 | .857 | 7.3 | 3.7 | 1.0 | .0 | 19.0 |
| 1996–97 | Detroit | 5 | 5 | 40.6 | .437 | .000 | .718 | 6.8 | 5.4 | .8 | 1.0 | 23.6 |
| 1998–99 | Detroit | 5 | 5 | 35.2 | .457 | .000 | .813 | 7.2 | 7.4 | 2.0 | .4 | 19.4 |
| 1999–00 | Detroit | 2 | 2 | 27.5 | .375 | .500 | .900 | 5.5 | 4.5 | .5 | .0 | 11.0 |
| 2006–07 | Orlando | 4 | 4 | 35.8 | .500 | .000 | .667 | 5.5 | 3.8 | .5 | .2 | 15.0 |
| 2007–08 | Phoenix | 3 | 2 | 22.7 | .455 | .000 | 1.000 | 5.3 | 1.0 | .7 | .3 | 3.7 |
| Career | 22 | 21 | 34.5 | .465 | .400 | .752 | 6.4 | 4.6 | 1.0 | .4 | 16.6 |
The importance of Game 1
159 of the 196 teams that won game 1 went on to win the series, which is 81.1%. I then separated the series into two categories: the first being when the home team wins game 1, the second being when to road team wins game 1. Here is what I found:
In the last 196 best of 7 series the home team won game one 146 times. 130 of those teams won the series (89%).
In the last 196 best of 7 series the road team won game one 50 times. Only 29 of those teams won the series (58%).
What is also important to note is that in the last 196 best of seven series, the team with the home court advantage has won 151 times (77%).
It’s not hard to figure out why these numbers are the way they are. The team with home court is in most cases the better team. The reason why only 16 teams with home court have lost a series after winning game is that you are asking an inferior team to win 4 of the next 6 games. Its hard enough for those teams to win 3 of 6, as you can see by close to half of the road teams losing a series after winning game 1.
So while its just game 1, and it’s a long series, you can argue that the first game is the most important. It sets the tone for the rest of the series.
I also have percentages of what happens in a series after 2 games, and I will post it tomorrow night.
Friday, April 16, 2010
NBA Playoff predictions: Round 1

Here are my predictions for Round 1 of the playoffs. Remember, I will amend these picks after each series has completed game 2.
#1 Cleveland vs #8 Chicago
I know people are saying the Bulls are dangerous because of what they did to Boston last year, but there are 2 big things to remember: Garnett didn’t play in that series, and the Bulls are without both John Salmons and Ben Gordon, translation: The Bulls are not as good now as they were last season at this time. This series won’t be the joke that the Pistons series was for the Cavs, but I don’t the Bulls threatening Cleveland, especially considering the Cavs hate them and will look to embarrass them.
Prediction: Cavs in 5
#2 Orlando vs #7 Charlotte
As I said last week, this is a bad matchup for the Bobcats. Orlando is playing its best basketball of the season, and they will want to make this a quick series because it is likely that the Hawks (Spoiler alert) will win their series easily. Charlotte is not good enough offensively to really put pressure on Orlando. They don’t have a low post scoring threat to get Howard in foul trouble, and they really don’t have a guy who can get in the paint. This will be a quick series with a team on a mission against a team happy to be there.
Prediction: Magic in 4
#3 Atlanta vs #6 Milwaukee
It really is a shame that Andrew Bogut got hurt because the Bucks really could’ve done some damage in these playoffs. They still went 4-2 without Bogut, but one of the 2 losses came against the Hawks, and in a series, the Bucks will miss his 16-10 and 2.5 blocks a game. Like Charlotte, I don’t think they are good enough offensively to muster up much of a challenge.
Prediction: Hawks in 5
#4 Boston vs #5 Miami
This is really where I was hoping a healthy Bucks team would end up because I think they would’ve beaten the Celtics easily. I am really amazed at how many people think this is the ’08 championship team. Can anyone point to anything positive this team has done recently? Even when they beat Cleveland they only played 3 quarters and almost blew a huge lead. They look old, and they don’t like each other. I know Boston won all 3 games that they played, but they haven’t played since Feb. 3, a lot has happened since then. Miami is better than people think, and they can give Boston some matchup problems especially with Michael Beasley. Remember, the Heat took Atlanta to game 7 last season.
Prediction: Heat in 6
#1 Lakers vs #8 Oklahoma City
This is a bad matchup for Oklahoma City. Pretty much all of their guys are going to the playoffs for the first time, and its Scott Brooks’ first playoff appearance as a coach. That stuff matters. Also, the Thunder’s big weakness is rebounding, and that is one of the Lakers big strengths. I also think that Ron Artest will frustrate Durant over the course of the series. Artest’s strength will bother KD. Lets not forget that Oklahoma City hasn’t been very good of late, and they are a bad team in crunch time. The reason they are playing the Lakers is because they blew a game in Portland Monday, a game they had a comfortable halftime lead in. The Lakers haven’t been great down the stretch, but they haven’t been terrible. Kobe has been in and out, and Andrew Bynum hasn’t played. This is different from the Celtics because the Lakers really aren’t old. Fisher is old and Kobe is older, but the rest of the team is still pretty much in their primes, they will be fine.
Prediction: Lakers in 5
#2 Dallas vs #7 San Antonio
I know the Spurs have played well down the stretch, but I just don’t get how so many people think the Spurs will win this series. I don’t see it. They are still really old, they aren’t very deep, and I don’t think the really have any matchups that really favor them, except for maybe Manu Ginobli. The Mavs are deeper, more versatile, and more athletic. Lets also remember that Dallas won the season series with the Spurs this season, and they destroyed San Antonio in this spot last season. San Antonio used to own the Mavs inside, that won’t happen in this series. I think once again the Mavs win it easily.
Prediction: Mavs in 5
#3 Phoenix vs #6 Portland
It’s really a shame that Brandon Roy can’t play because of the knee injury; otherwise this could’ve been a great series. Portland is just too weak at the wing positions to run with Phoenix, and they aren’t built to slow the game down because they don’t have a great low post threat, and they aren’t efficient enough offensively, which would slow the Suns down as well. It really feels like there is something special about this Suns team. I think Portland can win a game at home, but I don’t see them winning in Phoenix. Andre Miller as their best perimeter scorer will be a detriment.
Prediction: Suns in 5
#4 Denver vs #5 Utah
This is a weird series just because nobody is really sure who will be on the floor. Kirilenko is out for Utah, and that is a big loss because he could’ve done a good job on Carmelo Anthony. I think Utah’s best defense will wind up being their offense. They shoot 49% from the field, and they rebound well. That will slow Denver down, I also think that the Utah and the way they play will frustrate Denver, and lets be honest, The Nuggets are an insane group, and we are really seeing how valuable George Karl is because he was able to control the crazy guys. Denver hasn’t been the same since he left, and I don’t see how they get it back for this series. Plus Denver is awful on the road, and Utah finished with a winning record away from Salt Lake for the first time since I can remember.
Prediction: Jazz in 6
Playoff predictions coming soon
I’m going to do the same thing I did last season. I will make predictions now, and then I will amend those predictions after game 2 has been played. Last season I picked 7 of the 8 series correctly, I only missed on Dallas/San Antonio. After 2 games I didn’t change the winner for any series, I just adjusted the games. I picked the games each series would last correctly for all 7 series I got right, I got 4 of them correct before the series started, the remaining 3 I picked right after 2 games.
This link has the recap of my first round picks as well with the actual winners.
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
Scott Brooks should not be coach of the year
Friday, April 9, 2010
Can the Bobcats upset someone in the first round?

Wednesday night the Bobcats clinched a playoff spot for the first time in franchise history. They will be given no chance to compete against whoever they play, mostly because nobody has really seen them play. They haven't had a national TV game all season, and really, the only reason anyone has talked about them this season is because Michael Jordan bought a majority stake in the team. If you haven't seen them this season, you really haven't missed that much. They aren't overly exciting, they don't score a lot of points, in fact, only 2 teams in the league score less a game than they do, but that doesn't mean they aren't good. They are capable of shocking someone in the first round, here's why:
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
Did Rick Adelman take a shot at Don Nelson
Podcast #7: Talking Rockets with Sports Radio 610's Shaun Bijani
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
What if Yao decides to opt-out?
A year ago today, it was assumed that Yao Ming would opt out of the final year of his contract after this season. He was about finished with a regular season that saw him play 77 games, and average 20 points and 10 boards. Then Yao broke his foot in the playoffs against the Lakers, and the foot didn’t heal right, forcing him to miss this season. Yao couldn’t possibly opt out of over $15 million next season when he won’t play a minute this season could he? That is were the NBA’s expiring CBA enters in.
Whenever a new deal is struck between the owners and the players, it will likely benefit the owners, making this summer a more favorable environment for free agents, but more favorable to a guy who hasn’t played this season, and has his last 2 seasons cut short with foot injuries, and serious injuries the 2 years before that? I wouldn’t be shocked.
We are at a time in the NBA where making money is more important than winning, partly because most teams are having financial issues. Teams are much more willing to make moves that cost them wins if it helps them financially. Overpaying for Yao makes no sense basketball wise, but it’s a brilliant basketball move. Yao is a cash cow. He will sell a ton of season tickets, and open all sorts of new revenue streams for whatever team signs him. Don’t forget Yao is the most popular citizen of the planet’s most populated nation. That’s worth a lot of money.
I don’t think Yao will opt out this summer, but I think he will have a lot of people around him who will tell him too. The question is, if he does, at what lengths will the Rockets go to keep him, and who will be the team that offers him an enormous contract because somebody will.
Duke and Butler play a game for the ages

I spent a lot of time during the second half of the Butler/Duke game going through past championship games in my head. I was trying to figure out where this one stood. Turns out, we have been blessed with some great championship games, and I was just going back 15 years.
You had an amazing 3-year stretch in the late 90’s when in ‘97 Arizona upset Kentucky in Pitino’s last game at UK, the next year Kentucky stopped the mini-Cinderella run of Utah, who was a “little guy” even though they were a 3-seed. The Utes beat a great Arizona team that was a favorite to repeat with Mike Bibby and Miles Simon, in the regional final, and then beat North Carolina in the Final Four, a Carolina team with top 5 picks Vince Carter and Antawn Jamison. Then in ’99 an underrated UConn team with Richard Hamilton and Khalid El-Amin beat an elite Duke team that was riddled with guys picked in the top half of the first round- Elton Brand, Trajan Langdon, Corey Maggette, William Avery, and Shane Battier (’01 draft).
In the last decade you had the Syracuse/Kansas game in ’03, North Carolina/Illinois in ’05, and of course Kanas/Memphis in ’08, so no, last night’s Duke/Butler game isn’t the best of all-time, its not even the best championship game of the last 15 years, but it may very well go down as the most memorable.
It won’t be memorable for the talent that was assembled on the floor. Of the 15 guys who played serious minutes; none will likely play in an NBA all-star game. In terms of NBA talent this game could’ve been the worst in a long time. The only game that compares is the ’02 Indiana/Maryland game when the 2 best NBA players turned out to be Jared Jeffries and Steve Blake.
It won’t be memorable for a single performance. Kyle Singler was the game’s leading scorer, and he had just 19. Brian Zoubek was the game’s leading rebounder with just 10. Nobody had more than 2 blocks, nobody had more than 2 steals, and nobody had more than 5 assists.
It will be memorable for what it meant. A little school like Butler from the Horizon league going punch for punch with Duke for 40 minutes on the game’s biggest stage. They never trailed by more than 6 points, and there were times when it looked like Duke might take control and push the game to double digits, but they were able to dodge the patented Duke run, which is something that most big schools can’t avoid. It will be memorable for the intensity at which the game was played. There wasn’t a dull moment, at no point did you feel like you could change the channel, mostly because the game was close the entire way.
But most of all it will be memorable for the last 2 minutes, and the late comeback that Butler was able to make to give themselves a chance to win the game in the last minute a couple of times. It will be memorable for the stops Butler had to make at the end to give themselves a shot, and for the great defense that Duke played on Butler’s final possession, forcing Gordon Hayward into a tough fade away. And of course, it will be memorable for Hayward’s half court prayer that almost banked in. The collective “OOH” from the huge crowd at Lucas Oil stadium captured it perfectly.
The greatest game of all-time? No. The most memorable? Only time will tell.
Monday, April 5, 2010
Why Duke is better than we thought it was

I didn’t think it was possible, but for once we actually underrated Duke. That’s right, the Cowboys/Yankees/Lakers of college basketball was actually taken lightly after a half decade of March disappointments. A Duke team that won the ACC regular season and conference tournament championships was an after thought. They’re soft, they’re not athletic, all they do is shoot 3’s. That was the Duke image coming into this tournament a few weeks ago. That image should now be erased.
Why did we take this Duke team for granted? That is an easy one. 2004 was their last final four appearance coming into this season, that is the biggest drought in the Coach K era. They had pretty much flamed out in the last 5 tournaments, losing to a lower seed in all 5 losses, including getting blown off the court last season against Villanova in the regional semifinal. That is why this Duke team, even though they were ranked high all season, and even though they were a one seed, were not considered contenders.
We all got it wrong with this Duke team. This certainly isn’t the best Duke team to ever come through the pipes, but it is real good. Here are the 4 biggest reasons why the Devils have come obscurity, as obscure as Duke can be, and are 40 minutes away from their 4th championship:
Size
Duke basically plays 8 players. Only 2 of those players (Nolan Smith and Andre Dawkins) are shorter than 6-5. Jon Scheyer is 6-5, Kyle Singler and Lance Thomas are 6-8, the Plumlee’s are 6-10, and Brian Zoubek is 7-1. That is an incredible amount of size, and almost impossible to matchup with.
Rebounding/Toughness
These haven’t exactly been Duke calling cards in recent years, but now they are the best rebounding team in the nation. Just ask Baylor. If not for 19 offensive rebounds Duke doesn’t make it out of Houston. That is where their size is such a major factor, especially at the offensive end. They have an ability to keep possessions alive that frustrates opponents like nothing else will. 2 of their last 3 wins have come against Purdue and West Virginia, 2 of the most physical teams you could ever play, and not only did Duke come out alive, they came out with the rebounding edge.
Chemistry
I feel like Duke basketball players probably live in a bit of a cocoon, as do all major conference basketball teams do, so they spend a great deal off time off the court with each other. One of the things that really stuck out during the Houston regional was how often Coach K talked about how much his players genuinely liked one another more than any team he has ever coached. You can’t undervalue how important this is. When you are around a group of people for so much time, it helps when everyone gets along.
The Big 3
With Scheyer, Smith and Singler, the Devils have 3 big time scoring options. All 3 are capable of putting up 20 points any night, and that makes the game a lot easier. This could be the biggest difference between this Duke team and previous Duke teams. I don’t think there is a better trio in the nation, and it all starts with the improvement of Smith. He has brought a dynamic to the Duke offense that I don’t think they have had since Jason Williams. He can break down a defense, and Duke has really lacked that for quite some time. They always had the spot up shooters, but as Charles Barkley says every Thursday night “You don’t live by the 3, you die by the 3”. Duke hasn’t had to live by the 3 this season. With the emergence of Smith, Duke has been able to survive the brutal 1-11 game Scheyer had against Cal, as well as the 0-11 that Singler had against Baylor. You can survive awful games by your stars when you have guys capable of picking up the slack, and this Duke team has that.
Eagles end McNabb era with class

This may come as a surprise, but people in Philadelphia are not happy today. Not only did the Eagles trade Donovan McNabb, they traded to a team they will play twice every season, forcing Eagle fans to stomach seeing the best QB in franchise history play against them year after year, until his careers comes to an end.
Football wise, this was not a great move. Its not like the Skins overpaid for McNabb, hell they underpaid for him, especially when you consider the Broncos got a replacement QB, plus 2 first round picks and a third rounder for Jay Cutler last season, but this was a very different circumstance, and the Eagles didn’t have the interest in McNabb that the Bears had in Cutler. Even though they traded him to a team in their own division, they did the right thing.
They let him leave with grace, they didn’t ship him off somewhere he didn’t want to play, which could have made for an uncomfortable hold out situation that would have made him look bad, like the Pats did with Richard Seymour last season. They did the classy thing, and trust me, other players around the league noticed this as well. Treating players with respect makes players want to take less money just to go play there. By letting McNabb pick his new team the Eagles showed loyalty, and that is something that is missing right now in sports.